The growing collision between AI and copyright law
If your business uses AI tools to generate text, images, code, or marketing materials, you are operating in one of the most legally uncertain areas of modern technology. The intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law remains largely unresolved across most jurisdictions, and the European Union is only beginning to draw the lines.
For small and medium businesses across Italy and Europe, this is not an abstract legal debate. It is a practical risk that affects daily operations, from the content you publish on your website to the product descriptions generated by ChatGPT or the visuals created with Midjourney.
What the law says today (and what it does not)
Traditional copyright law was designed for human creators. A painter creates a work, and that work is automatically protected. A writer publishes a novel, and the text belongs to them. But when an AI model generates an image after being prompted with a sentence, the legal framework begins to crack.
In most EU member states, copyright protection requires a human author who made creative choices. The US Copyright Office has repeatedly ruled that purely AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted. Italy’s own diritto d’autore framework, rooted in Law 633/1941, similarly ties protection to human intellectual creation.
This creates a paradox for businesses. If you use AI to draft a blog post or generate a product image, you may not own the copyright to that output. Your competitors could legally reuse it. At the same time, the training data that powered those AI models may have been scraped from copyrighted works without permission, exposing you to potential liability on both ends.
The EU AI Act and copyright transparency
The EU AI Act, which entered into force in August 2024 and is being phased in through 2027, introduced specific copyright-related obligations for AI providers. Under Article 53, providers of general-purpose AI models must publish sufficiently detailed summaries of the training data used, and they must comply with EU copyright rules, including the text and data mining exceptions under the DSM Directive (2019/790).
What does this mean in practice? AI providers operating in Europe must now respect opt-out mechanisms. If a content creator or publisher has reserved their rights against text and data mining, AI companies cannot legally use that content for training. Major European publishers and news agencies have already begun asserting these rights aggressively.
For SMBs, the implication is indirect but real. The AI tools you rely on may face legal challenges that affect their availability, pricing, or output quality in the European market.
Pending litigation shaping the landscape
The legal battles are piling up. Getty Images sued Stability AI in London for training on millions of copyrighted photographs. The New York Times filed suit against OpenAI and Microsoft in late 2023, a case still working through US courts. In Italy, SIAE (the Italian Authors and Publishers Society) entered negotiations with major AI companies over music and literary rights as early as 2023.
A 2024 study by the European Parliamentary Research Service estimated that generative AI could affect revenue streams for over 12 million creative workers across the EU. The financial stakes are enormous, and courts have barely started issuing precedents.
Practical risks for European SMBs
If you run a business in Italy or elsewhere in Europe, here is what you need to understand right now.
You might not own what AI creates for you
As mentioned, purely AI-generated content likely falls outside copyright protection in EU jurisdictions. However, if a human employee substantially directs, edits, and shapes the AI output, the result may qualify for protection. The key word is “substantially.” Simply writing a prompt is unlikely to meet the threshold.
What to do: Document your creative process. If your marketing team uses AI as a starting point and then rewrites, restructures, and adds original analysis, keep records of that workflow. This paper trail could matter if ownership is ever disputed.
You could face infringement claims
If AI-generated content closely resembles existing copyrighted material, your business could be on the receiving end of an infringement claim, even if you had no intent to copy. In the EU, copyright infringement does not require intent.
A 2025 survey by the Italian Digital SME Alliance found that 38% of small businesses using generative AI had no internal guidelines on checking outputs for potential copyright issues.
What to do: Implement a review step before publishing AI-generated content. Use plagiarism detection tools. For high-value or public-facing content, have a human expert verify originality.
Contracts and licensing matter more than ever
When you subscribe to an AI service, the terms of service define what you can and cannot do with the output. These terms vary dramatically. Some platforms grant you full commercial rights to outputs. Others retain broad licenses or disclaim any guarantee of non-infringement.
What to do: Read the terms of service for every AI tool your company uses. Pay particular attention to indemnification clauses, or the lack thereof. If a client or partner requires guaranteed IP ownership, AI-generated work may not satisfy that requirement without significant human modification.
Building an AI content policy for your business
The smartest move for any European SMB right now is to develop a clear internal policy on AI-generated content. This does not need to be a hundred-page legal document. A practical, one-page guideline covering three areas is enough.
Permitted uses. Define where AI tools can be used (first drafts, brainstorming, data analysis) and where they cannot (final client deliverables, legally sensitive documents).
Human oversight requirements. Specify that all AI-generated content must be reviewed and meaningfully edited by a team member before publication or delivery to clients.
Record-keeping. Require employees to note when AI tools were used in the creation process. This transparency protects your business in both directions: it supports copyright claims where human contribution was significant, and it demonstrates good faith if questions arise.
What comes next
The European Commission is expected to issue further guidance on AI and intellectual property throughout 2026 and 2027 as the AI Act’s provisions take full effect. Italy’s Autorità Garante and AGCOM are both actively monitoring the space. Courts across Europe will inevitably produce landmark rulings that reshape the current ambiguity.
Until then, the businesses that will be best positioned are those that treat AI as a powerful assistant rather than an autonomous creator. Use the technology, but keep humans in the loop, document your processes, and stay informed as regulations evolve. In a legal landscape still being written, caution is not a competitive disadvantage. It is a strategic advantage.
Need support on this topic? Contact us for a free consultation — let’s assess your company’s situation together.
Stay updated every week on cybersecurity, AI and technology for SMBs: subscribe to our newsletter.